Check dangerous modules instead of dangerous patterns #877
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
aymeric-roucher
approved these changes
Mar 5, 2025
|
I agree the error message should be improved: however the new security mechanism does not only check for imports (this was the cause of some previous vulnerabilities), but for any access to a module (as attribute, for example). Something like: |
|
Also, I am trying to cover the missing dangerous functions previously listed in dangerous patterns. |
albertvillanova
changed the title
|
Added an extra security check for dangerous functions, besides dangerous modules
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Skip dangerous modules instead of dangerous patterns.
After this PR:
pandas.ioEDIT:
globalsandlocalsto this listFix #663.
Supersede and close #664.